Ieri sera ho visto su Rai Tre il racconto di Angelo Pietrolucci malato di mieloma multiplo che di ritorno dalla Spagna a Roma con Ryanair ha vissuto una vicenda inquietante.
Invalido al 100% a causa della malattia, Pietrolucci che vola regolarmente per lavoro chiede di essere assistito all'imbarco da Ryanair. La compagnia aerea dopo averlo fatto aspettare per fare imbarcare tutti gli altri passeggeri finalmente si decide a farlo salire a bordo. A quel punto la maggior parte dei posti were employed because there is no possibility to reserve seats with Ryanair, and therefore can not find a place in the front rows where, because of his disability, usually manages to sit down. Is then invited to sit in row 32 in front of the bewilderment of the passengers start to complain.
Pietrolucci at this point sits with his wife and niece of six years without protest, but disappointed by the attitude of the crew a little sympathetic to him. At this point, and in a totally incomprehensible, a flight attendant approached Pietrolucci and informed him that the captain asked him to get off the aircraft as "passenger side". Now I wonder: passenger side? But who? A person who is ill and invalid to 100% may show signs of discouragement, like all of us for much less, and yet passively accept the harassment of people who have not understood the seriousness of his situation?
However, Mr. Pietrolucci at this point is refusing to get off the aircraft and demanded to see the captain who not only refuses to see him again but deep down, threatening to call the police. I ask again: who are faced with a situation so absurd would not oppose a threat as unwarranted and unjust? Moreover, anyone, but especially in a sick person who travels with his wife and granddaughter at some point take a spring of pride and steadfastness in the face of a abuse of this type, and then again Pietrolucci refuses to comply with the orders of the commander.
At this point, the English police that before pulling gently and then mistreated Pietrolucci gives him the fracture of the humerus because of its precarious condition skeletal. Finally after an hour flight for Rome but on arrival at Ciampino Pietrolucci the poor must resort to the care of doctors.
incredible the declaration of Michael O'Leary, Ryanair chief executive of a Mi Manda Rai Tre:
"Ryanair gives top priority to the safety of all passengers and we are unable to maintain a single passenger, damage l'incolumità di tutti i passeggeri. Pietrolucci è considerato persona che ha difficoltà a muoversi e quindi in caso di emergenza potrebbe compromettere l'evacuazione dell'aeromobile. Il capitano ha fatto la cosa giusta (a dichiarare Pietrolucci passeggero indesiderato domando io?) e aveva chiesto alla polizia di prestare particolare attenzione al Signor Pietrolucci a causa della sua malattia. Mi scuso con il signor Pietrolucci per i danni che ha subito"
Continuo a credere che la vicenda ha dell'incredibile. Ma come si può chiamare la polizia che mette su tutta una sceneggiata minacciando il povero Pietrolucci mostrandogli le manette davanti alla nipotina piangente e alla moglie che urla di non toccarlo in quanto gravemente malato? Ma che kind of threat could actually be such as to require Ryanair to Pietrolucci interveniore the police do? Since Pietrolucci was already sitting in the row that the flight attendant had told him what was the need to put on this whole skit that did not only delay the departure of one hour with great disservice to all passengers? Would it not be more likely that it is a very absurd personal pique of the captain and flight attendants?
We sent a letter to the CEO Michael O'Leary dated May 12, which, as we expected, we have not to date received no reply.
0 comments:
Post a Comment